Skip to main content
Cari

In this post, Joe Lawson, Chairman of the Stakeholder Advisory Committee, welcomes the publication of the latest KPMG report on APRIL Group’s implementation of its Sustainable Forest Management Policy 2.0.

As Chairman of APRIL’s independent Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC), I am pleased to provide you with the recently completed assurance report assessing APRIL’s ( Asia Pacific Resources International Limited ) progress in implementing its SFMP 2.0.

Commitments in SFMP 2.0 include a halt to the harvest of mixed hardwoods, the development of only non-forested areas as determined by HCV and HCS, the application of a landscape approach to optimize forest conservation, the establishment of an Independent Peat Expert Working Group (IPEWG), and a range of processes to promote engagement with local communities.

The SAC commissioned KPMG PRI Performance Registrar Inc. (KPMG PRI) to undertake a thorough assurance engagement against SFMP 2.0 for the first time in 2016, using a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) that had been developed by the SAC in consultation with stakeholders. The 2016 report set an objective baseline, available to external stakeholders, evaluating APRIL’s performance against its sustainability policy.

Joe Lowson - APRIL Asia

Joe Lawson, Chair, APRIL Stakeholder Advisory Committee

In 2017, the SAC selected seven core KPIs and commissioned KPMG PRI to conduct an interim assurance engagement, thus allowing shifting the assurance process to a calendar year schedule.

For this year, the SAC commissioned the second full-scope assurance report against 45 indicators, covering the period January to December 2017. In conducting the assurance engagement and producing the report, KPMG PRI’s processes included field verification of APRIL’s operations, a review of the company’s reporting methodology and data, visits to Supply Partners and Open Market supplier concessions (selected following a specific risk assessment) and interviews with key staff.

This was also the first occasion that observers were invited to accompany the KPMG PRI team in the field. These local representatives from Riau provided insightful observations, which will help continue to improve the assurance process.

An indicator revision process took place throughout 2017 whereby local and international stakeholders provided input to the 2016 set of KPIs. This resulted in the addition of seven new indicators and the addition or modification of disclosures for one third of the final KPI set.

The findings of this year’s KPMG PRI assurance report were presented to the SAC in July 2018. They can be summarized as follows:

  1. Zero deforestation and no mixed hardwood use commitments are upheld.
  2. In 2017, PT. RAPP made significant progress in developing a Conservation Management Plan within its concessions. This risk based mapping program is designed to identify priority areas for protection, and considers existing conservation and its quality, adjacent habitat features up to 5 km outside of concession boundaries that can be linked and associated risks to existing conservation (such as focal areas for encroachment). Engagement of local communities will be an important aspect of this program.
  3. Interviews with a number of local businesses who have been supported in their development by the PT. RAPP community development program indicated a long-term interest by PT. RAPP rather than one time support. This includes the provision of business and technical training over time to support the expansion of these businesses.
  4. Significant improvements were noted during 2017 in enhancing transparency in APRIL’s supply chain and its ability to access supplier data. This includes data from Open Market suppliers, a focus area for the SAC. Work continues to close remaining gaps in 2018, monitored by the SAC.
  5. 65 of the 118 recommendations given to APRIL by the SAC since 2014 have been successfully implemented. The SAC undertook a consolidation process whereby 15 old recommendations were incorporated into the 19 currently active recommendations (in progress or in development), which APRIL will focus on moving forward.
  6. A total of 2 non-conformances and 12 opportunities for improvement were identified by KPMG PRI. The areas of non-conformance related to a land recovery on peat following encroachment, where a small area was replanted in contravention of newly released operational guidelines, and discrepancies in understanding and implementation of employment conditions for one contractor. APRIL has developed Action Plans to address these non-conformances as well as areas for improvement. These have been revised and accepted by the audit firm and will be subject to future assurance reviews.

The third party assurance program is an important part of the SAC’s role of providing oversight and scrutiny of APRIL’s conformance with SFMP 2.0 requirements.

The 2018 Report represents a significant process improvement over previous reports but we consider this program a work in progress. The SAC and KPMG PRI are already developing improvements for the 2019 Assurance and all inputs are welcome. You can download the report here.

svg+xml;charset=utf — APRIL Asia
sustainable growth — APRIL Asia

Method

Waste disposed is recorded through various means of measurement including estimation of weight by waste type. Particular waste types as described above are measured as a wet waste and converted to a bone dry (BD) weight. The wet waste weight is multiplied by the consistency of each waste type to determine the BD. The consistency is predetermined by the lab.

Baseline
71kg/T

Performance 2022

On Track

sustainable growth — APRIL Asia

Method

The DPTW utilisation rate and % of textile waste per tonne of product will be based on R&D lab/pilot/demo procedures.

Baseline
0%

Performance 2022

In Development

sustainable growth — APRIL Asia

Method

Water consumption per tonne of product is calculated based on water consumed in the production of saleable pulp, paper, viscose staple fiber and viscose yarn measured by flow meters, via calculation and water balances divided by the production figures for saleable pulp, paper, viscose staple fibre and viscose yarn.

Baseline
28 m3/T

Performance 2022

Not Progressing

sustainable growth — APRIL Asia

Method

Soda content within the liquor cycle and losses are determined by means of mass balance based on daily lab analysis.

Lime volume in the lime kiln and losses are determined by means of lime make-up.

The recovery rate is calculated net of the percentage of make-up amounts added. The annual figure is based on the average monthly recovery rate.

Baseline
96%

Performance 2022

Not Progressing

inclusive progress — APRIL Asia

Method

Number of Mill and Nursery contractor calculated based on Man Power data which grouped by gender level calculated as a monthly average.

Baseline
2571

inclusive progress — APRIL Asia

Method

The number of own and supply partners employees is calculated based on year-end Man Power data which is grouped by gender. The identification of leadership position refer to employees’ grade D2 or Manager level and above.

Baseline
55 women employees in leadership positions

Performance 2022

Progressing

inclusive progress — APRIL Asia

Method

Women’s effective participation is identified from the participation list for each program. Percentage of female participation is calculated by the number of women participating divided by the total participants.

Baseline
34%

Performance 2022

Progressing

inclusive progress — APRIL Asia

Method

In development

Baseline
In development

Performance 2022

Progressing

inclusive progress — APRIL Asia

Method

In development

Baseline
In development

Performance 2022

Progressing

inclusive progress — APRIL Asia

Method

In development

Baseline
In development

Performance 2022

Progressing

inclusive progress — APRIL Asia

Method

We engaged third party to conduct assessment in APRIL-supported schools using the framework that was developed by Research Triangle Institute (RTI) and USAID.

Baseline
In development

Performance 2022

Progressing

inclusive progress — APRIL Asia

Method

Poverty mapping is identified through:

  1. Desktop analysis using National Statistics, Village Potential Statistics, SMERU Poverty Map.
  2. On-the-ground verification through FGD, village transect walk, interview with community.

Baseline
3%

Performance 2022

Progressing

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

Peer-reviewed scientific journal publication standards

Baseline
1

Performance 2022

On Track

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

Documentation of Participation (presentation of papers or posters) in national and international dialogues, workshops and conferences

Baseline
6

Performance 2022

On Track

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

Number of scientists from universities and research institutions that have collaborated with APRIL on peatland management during the calendar year

Baseline
9

Performance 2022

On Track

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

Wood deliveries (excluding open market supply) to the mill are used as a basis to calculate MAI (Tonnes/ Ha/Yr). The MAI is based on the 3 year area weighted rolling average growth for all closed compartments.

Baseline
20T/ha/yr

Performance 2022

On Track

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

Methodology to be developed specific to animal species and does not include plants. Qualifying initiatives may vary widely in nature but must have the animal protection as the primary objective.

Partnerships will be developed and documented in line with an overarching strategy prioritizing stakeholders and threats specific to the country of Indonesia assessed.

Performance 2022

Progressing

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

May include various initiatives relating to conservation of RTE species to be defined in a priority list, initiatives may be conducted solely or in collaboration with other stakeholders.

Baseline
2

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

Methodology to be developed to measure change in ecosystem services and values over time (carbon sequestration, water provision, resource provision including fish and honey)

Baseline
not yet developed

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

Reports for reforestation of previously encroached and degraded area including all areas where assisted natural regeneration, planting or enrichment planting of species that improve habitat value have taken place during the year but excludes natural regeneration.

Baseline
275 ha

Performance 2022

Progressing

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

Area within conservation is derived from land bank which is based on land cover analysis and is updated annually to capture any boundary changes, land use changes or measurement data.

Baseline
0 ha Net loss

Performance 2022

Not Progressing

thriving landscapes — APRIL Asia

Method

Landscape conservation funding includes restoration and conservation costs associated with the RER as well as the allocation of a proportion of the costs related to APRIL’s maintenance of conservation values under its production-protection model. The allocation is based on proportionate amount of each cost that is related to conservation and restoration.

The wood volume is based on wood delivered to the Mill.

Baseline
USD$0.7 per tonne of plantation fiber

Performance 2022

On Track

climate positive 1 — APRIL Asia

Method

Mill

Calculate from the records of fuel types used the amount consumed in boilers to generate power, heat and steam including energy use for mobile & including transportation. Each of the fuel types are converted to energy expressed by Giga Joule Lower Heating Value (GJ LHV) following the IPCC guidelines.

Baseline: 87%

Performance 2022

On Track

Forest Operations

Calculate from the records of fuel types the quantity consumed by major categories of forest management activities by Fiber operations.

This covers energy used for Forest operations, infrastructure including wood transport from estate to mill; When a blend of fuel types is used (such as B20) the contribution to renewable and cleaner energy targets is calculated separately for each fuel rather than considering the blend as a cleaner fuel type.

Baseline: 19%

Performance 2022

Progressing

climate positive 1 — APRIL Asia

Method

APRIL follows the international GHG protocol as developed by WRI/WBCSD to develop its emissions profile. The total emissions measured as emissions intensity is calculated based on tonnes of Scope 1 and 2 Mill Greenhouse Gas Emissions per tonne of product (paper, pulp and viscose). The emissions boundary scope covers gate-to-gate (wood processing in wood yard until pulp, paper and viscose production) of the three main GHGs: CO2, CH4, and N2O.

Baseline
0.55 tCO2e/product tonne

Performance 2022

On Track

climate positive 1 — APRIL Asia

Method

To quantify the total GHG emission and removals across APRIL’s land bank from land use, APRIL follows the GHG Protocol Agricultural Guidance and IPCC Guidelines for Agricultural, Forestry, and Other Land Use. To detect the land cover change within the look-back period, i.e. 20 years APRIL utilized the remotely sensed data.

The GHG emission will be calculated as the total of carbon stock changes in woody biomass and soil organic carbon and include all major carbon fluxes such as peat decomposition, plantation growth and harvesting, and fires.

To quantify the amount of carbon unit to balance the emission, the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS), the Climate, Community and Biodiversity Standards (CCB), or other internationally accepted standard will be used.

Performance 2022

Progressing

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.